| |
PULP PASSIONS

an interview with Sarah Berney by
Peter Barton
Sarah Berney lives in a clean, well
lighted hermitage on Warren Street in Hudson, NY, once the studio
of George McKinstry, turn of the century Hudson River School artist.
She also maintains a pocket-sized room on the Lower East side of
Manhattan in order to make paper paintings at Dieu Donne paperworks
in SoHo. Determined to follow a vision that leads away from the
humanist realms of figuration and representational traditions, she
has placed her foot squarely on the metaphysical plane of expressive
and sensual abstraction in order to explore feelings more wedded
to the present tense of contemporary art and experiences more intrinsic
to her own life. The artist is interviewed in the stark, sunbeamed
twilight hours of her studio and is found to possess a surprising
depth of devotion to her art form, unexpected because of the bright
and easy persona by which people and friends know her best.
PETER BARTON: There is the
social impress of new mediums invading art consciousness - computer
imaging, digital art, video art and all the rest of it - still you
seem content to work with wet and messy handmade paper - slurry,
sloppy, tactile stuff. Don't you feel any pressure to change your
work or medium?
SARAH BERNEY: In my earlier
work, when I was doing figurative work, I felt it lacked a sophistication
and the way I resolved that was to go into abstraction. That's the
response which is important to the question. As far as paper is
concerned, obviously I'm a fan of paper and I don't think there
is anything it can't do. It think it translates the artist's work
no matter what the content or intention is. So if I were a computer
artist or wanted to work in more technical forms the paper could
go along with it. The paper isn't holding me back from making changes,
I've been into this medium for twenty years and worked across many
styles and techniques and they always translate seamlessly. Paper
itself has modern elements, the materials and ways of making it
have undergone innovations which are available and provide that
sense of contemporary process if you want to use it to push boundaries.
Synthetic fibers and binders, for example. The only pressure I
might feel - and I can't say I'd even call it that it's more of
a responsibility - is pushing the boundaries while keeping the traditional
affects or esthetic experiences in tact. This way of working is
integral to why I use the medium and I don't want to lose it or
push it away just for ideas or the pressure to conform. When you
are creating, or in the creative process, you adhere to the sensations
which guide you because art making is such difficult work.
PB: I don't want to gloss
over your initial comment that you solved your psychological perplexity
with figuration by working in abstraction. This is an enormous leap
that many artists simply can't perform. How did you source this
new inspiration?

SB: My mind made the leap;
and therefore my art had to make the leap. I was feeling a ball
and chain with the figurative work, the me-me, the I-I
of it was tedious, it was so close to reality and the artist's interpretation
or representation of the visual, the seen world. I've painted all
my life, every moment of my life you might say, but through childhood
I always painted out of my dark side. And when you work so close
to your own self, you are what you eat, you are your art. So it
was a self-fulfilling negativity. I started to read New Age books
and delve into these experiences and I realized that I have a bright
side, and why not work out of the light and not from angst.
PB: Traditionally these spiritual
transitions take considerable time and effort...
SB: Four days, believe it
or not! After only four days, all this stuff started to come out,
beacons of light, power sources, very positive and affirming energies
that had been dammed up. I wanted to see these energies, let them
materialize and make me happier, make my life better. It was all
there for me first and the art followed along reflecting what was
already very vivid, already existing inside my mind.
PB: Spiritual emotion and
esthetic emotion share the same ground. Did you feel that immersing
yourself in the wet, colorful, romantic paper-making process provided
you with a more spiritual way of life? I mean, did making art become
a spiritual as well as an esthetic realm of sensations?
SB: Whatever I'm thinking
comes out in my art work. At times I am more spiritual than at other
times. It's funny. Very often your art work is intellectually ahead
of where you yourself are. Your subconscious is way ahead of you.
You feel deep down sensations, have glimpses, stirrings along the
way of things that are reoccurring. In terms of the paper and being
physical, I like to turn things on, fiddle and play around, do things
with my hands, and paper is about the most wonderful physical experience
of making stuff you can have. You can just hang in a bucket of cotton
and linen slurry and feel satisfied, charged, so completely present
in yourself. You can become addicted to the tactile part
of it, and any artist working this way will tell you that, it's
a shared even if not an outspoken awareness. In that sense you feel
guided by your senses which react to what's coming from inside your
head.
PB: Your art exudes sensuality.
You don't paint or color on paper, the color is actually impregnated
into the coarse texture and fiber of the paper. How does this limit
your gestural spontaneity?
SB: When you do a big series
there's days and days of preparation, making your pulp, making your
pallet, arranging your work area... But once you have your colors
set it starts to flow, to sing. Right from the beginning of your
base shape, which you form with a screen and a mold - it's called
a mold and deckle - and that dictates the size and thickness of
your sheet. So you, from the beginning, try to get some swirling,
some atmosphere going in the base shape. I do my rendering in pigmented
linen in squeeze bottles. Linen is very smooth and silky, fluid.
Color saturates it more than it does cotton which is also clumsier,
more cloggy. I render with the squeeze bottles right into the cotton
slurry, and it is fully expressive, gestural and immediate in every
sense, from mental impulse to sensual gesture, wet and thrilling
in many ways - until you press it! When you press the work and it
starts to dry, that's when you give up the control. You really don't
know the final outcome. Some of those surprises are wonderful and
some of them are not so wonderful. Once the water is forced out,
the image is totally integrated into that base shape. You can keep
working a piece as long as it's wet, but when it's dried out, it's
over - for me. Other artists begin working on dry paper, but you
see how it goes in my work. The final emotion of holding the dry
image is the end of the piece for me and that last sensation is
out of my hands.

PB: Paradoxically, this wet
effect in the process exerts a rigid control over your content doesn't
it? You can't do intricate or figurative images....
SB: I beg to differ! Because
I was a figurative painter for twenty-five, and I thought of paper
as an adjunct to my painting, I forced the paper process to be as
realistic as possible. Here, look at this catalogue. See how intricate
the rendering is while the process gives a loose interpretation
to the image? You can write in it, do figures or other images, whatever.
You have a lot of control especially if you use templates. It's
adaptive.
PB: You did a lot of body
work. There is a degree of sexual imagery and energy, fleshy nudes,
and so on. This pink rose is more than a rose obviously.
SB: My figurative work was
very sexual - woman as sexual object, objects as fleshy and feminine,
not obsessively so but not just idealistically either. For the past
several years I have been living like a monk practically, as you
can see - no phone, a simple studio and my dog Belle De Jour.
But it wasn't always this way, I was very much a party animal, a
guy junkie, relating men to myself and worrying about how this compromised
the seriousness of my work and that struggle is in there, very obvious
in its own way.
PB: At the time was this political
commentary, ending the fear of flying, feminism?
SB: It was what it was! You
are what you eat.
PB: So these figures are all
female, are they all you, you were painting yourself?
SB: I always loved figure
work and these came out of that, from formal figure study. I used
my own body because it was there, it was easy to relate to from
internal experience. I used models as well, a lot of models because
working from yourself gets old fast, boring in a way, but when you
want to paint you just paint and my body was available. Now all
my art is metaphysical, even scientific, geomtric and the imagery
is metaphorical, the shapes are symbolic, even, of larger implications,
again ending the me-me fixation and looking into universal
meanings... I was a colorist in a paper mill for many years, so
color became the essential form for sensuality, the flow of colors,
how colors move with other colors, the range of experiences when
laying them down, and how they effect you emotionally through the
eyes... This was probably the pivotal crossover for me, where
there was transition to pure abstract yet sensual sensations. I
was such a symbolist in my representational painting and wondered
at times what I was going to do about this in the abstract work.
But then color itself became emotional symbolism, and when it is
contained in geometric form it resonates powerfully as an emotional
state. Red stands for female, blue stands for male - not intentionally,
but that's just how it is. So when I do something red, I have to
do something blue, there is this need for duality, balance, which
I deal with a lot.
PB: Are you all to the bright
side then, or do you lapse back?
SB: Funny you should say
that! This is the most interesting thing because too much of a good
thing can go bad. [Laughing] After six years of consciously keeping
the dark out, I realized this is only one half of the story. I was
doing a lot of rectangles, which is how I work, I do a lot of a
thing and choose the ones that work best. But after maybe forty
of these bright-side rectangles, darker forms came out and I saw
it so clearly, that these have to be part of the work - in fact,
they have to be in the work at the outset, the idea of light and
dark. I will say I had been reading concepts of the Qabala - not
the Qabala itself - and this idea of The Abyss rose up. I
was in an abyss at the time, due to financial things and stress
which are the most common source of darkness for me now, and it
just popped out in the painting and changed the direction of everything...
Art for me is a journey, a journey about letting go, even of the
idea of only focusing only on the light. Once you let go, I mean
really let go! of whatever you are holding onto, then life
begins to unfold in the most mysterious ways, the little magical
things begin to flow in. In that way, the older I get the more I
commit to my art, and the spiritual flows in, not necessarily that
easily, but naturally.
PB: You've done a lot of work
on yourself, knitting behavior to ideal. Most people are to one
side or the other. But you also seem so specific, so filled with
your art and work. Does this make relationships more difficult?
Do you sacrifice intimacy or sameness with other people owing to
such a sophisticated abstraction?
SB: Wow! These questions...
I always wanted to be one of these people who could be in the studio
for days and not need anyone else. Well, I've achieved that! I feel
I almost made a pact with the devil and got that. Relationships
are secondary to me. I just want to run to the studio, lock the
door, empty my mind and work. Right now I don't know how to go back.
Whenever I get into a male relationship my work starts to get pretty,
I start trying to please or defuse the intensity of my art and anything
that intimidated or threatened the guy I was with at the time got
thrown out the window. I can't do that anymore. I'm getting that
full power and enjoyment out of my own work, and that has to point
the way until...well, until it opens up another path someone who
can take me as I am. Taking my art seriously is joyful, my work
is my joy and that feeling can't be found in anyone else or sacrificed
to anybody either. Art is just that, art - nothing more any certainly
nothing less.
PB: You mentioned the Qabalistic
Abyss and art as livelihood. What is your biggest
fear right now, is it still financial stress?
SB: For the first time I'm
really, really scared. It has just become very difficult and although
I live in the bright center of my art vision with as little as possible
to get by, the sky outside is always getting darker in that respect.
Maybe it's this way for you, but art is an addiction, an obsession.
I will sell anything I have, go to any extreme to keep this art
going. It is all I have ever done all my life, is focus on the means
to keep doing this work. But lately I wonder what will become of
me if the magic doesn't begin to flow in that particular way. It
seems to hide from brightness and I begin to wonder whether I will
fall away into the dark again.
Sarah Berney's work has representation
through the Carrie Haddad Gallery in Hudson, New York and Pardo
Lattuada Gallery in New York City's Chelsea District. See her work
at http://www.pardolattuadagallery.com/.
Peter Barton is an artist and journalist, and his work can also
be seen at: http://www.pardolattuadagallery.com/
|
|